This post features UUA candidate for president, the Rev. Dr. Laurel Hallman, in her opening speech. This is a new blog which provides a neutral territory to discuss the platforms of the two UUA candidates, Peter Morales and Laurel Hallman.
Below follows both the transcript and the video portion. The original video is now back online at the official UUA site, albeit without Question One.
http://www.uua.org/events/generalassembly/2008/112314.shtml
Rev. Morales’ opening speech was posted in the prior post (because he spoke first). All other segments of the debate will follow in the coming days.
To view just the segment with Rev. Hallman’s opening speech click below.
Description:
Rev. Dr. Laurel Hallman gives her opening speech at the UUA Candidate forum, explaining why she is running for UUA president. The complete transcript of the June 28, 2008 forum with the other candidate, Rev. Peter Morales, can be downloaded here: uuacandidateforum
Campaign website: http://HallmanForUUAPresident.com
Opening Speech Rev. Dr. Laurel Hallman
“To build a church that shall be free!”
We sing it, we celebrate it in our affirmations and covenants: the free church, a home for the free spirit in which we can live and move and have our being.
In Dallas, people often come to our church and weep, because their hearts and minds and spirits have been starved for our liberating message. They tell us they thought they were crazy until they found our church. In towns and cities and homes and store fronts all across our nation we gather, quite simply to be a support to one another, and more deeply to touch the heart and to remind again, be reminded again of what Mary Oliver calls “our place in the family of things”.
I stand before you today because I believe that our task remains always new and always eternal: to build the church that shall be free. We sang it at merger, it’s what we said we would do together. Assuming we meant it then and aspire to it even today, it will require – and incidentally, this is what we tell new members – it will require that we each find our own center of strength, that would be a regular spiritual practice.
That we each are present in church or in our congregational life, that we become part of what goes on in our congregations. That we live in the expectation that we will be changed, because we will be changed if we engage ourselves in our congregations and in our associational life. That we will embody the spirit of generosity – and that doesn’t mean the rich, it means everybody with open heart and open mind and allowing the other space to exist (and maybe it means a little bit about money), that we will find ways to serve others.
This is what we expect of our new members, that they will engage seriously in service, in opportunities that we provide at the church and in the larger community.
I stand before you tonight because I know there is a liberating power, which can be awakened in a 22 year old young adult raised as a fundamentalist Christian.
A power, which in a simple signing of a membership book in a Unitarian Universalist church bound her to truths she had yet to even imagine. A power of heart and mind, which caused her to realize she didn’t want to marry a minister, she wanted to be one.
A power, which said, she had a voice when she had never even heard it take form.
A power, which helped her stay steady through all the usual difficulties and blessings of a long ministry.
A power embodied in the people who blessed her life and liberated her from fear of that fundamentalist upbringing.
In this I speak of my own liberation, and also of the power of the free spirit to bind all our hearts to love, our hands to service, and our minds to truth. It is this power that brings me here tonight in this place before you. I will be a president first in the skills and values, which will make our faith vital and effective in the new world before us. I will be a president of deep and abiding faith in that free spirit to liberate even us from the ways we sometimes make our faith too small.
When I am president I will remember that 22 year old woman who was lost until she found our faith with its liberating word, and its call to justice, and hope. I won’t forget the young people who come to us now, needing that same liberating word. I will remember the voice on a call-in radio show from a small rural town in Texas, of a man who tentatively asked me if we were really a church where a gay man would be welcome. He said it in total disbelief.
I won’t forget those who still need to hear of our bold welcome.
I will remember the African-American woman who always made a habit of reading the entry in the encyclopedia before and after anything that she looked up, and found the entry on Unitarian Universalism that way. As she drove toward our church the next Sunday she became increasingly anxious about our location. She said to herself if these people are who they say they are – in the encyclopedia – it will be all right. She has been an active member of our congregation now for 20 years. I won’t forget all the others who haven’t found us yet, and I will make sure it’s all right when they come.
I bring with me to the presidency of the UUA the lives of the people, the hopes of generations, the hard work of building free congregations along with great hopes and expectations for our future.
I ask you to elect me as your president and then commit yourselves as I am committed to reclaim the tradition which liberated us and blessed our lives and to recommit ourselves to the many people who still need our saving message: the people living lives of quiet desperation in our midst, the children who need our wise teachings as they grow, and the cause of liberation where ever the structures of society bind the mind, the body, and the hearts of people everywhere – they need us, and they need us desperately.
The last stanza of the hymn we sang at merger proclaims:
“Prophetic church, the future waits your liberating ministry, go forward in the power of love, proclaim the truth that makes us free.”
As the senior minister of one of our largest churches, one which has doubled its membership, doubled its religious education programming and raised our budget almost ten times what it was when I began, I bring experience and institutional know-how to help us be agile and responsible and responsive and prudent as an association.
At the same time I bring a lifetime of spiritual work. Some of you are familiar with ‘Living by Heart’ practice, which I learned from my mentor, Harry Scholefield. Harry used the memorization of poetry and prose as a mantra for his spiritual practice and nourishment for his soul. I know we are a people who seek religious depth and have found this to be a vehicle for that depth, which goes beyond the usual theological categories which sometimes trip us up.
As your president I will wed my expectations of leadership with spiritual depth so that as we live in the world we can live so effectively and also as faithful agents and courageous, transformative agents in the world. The future is in our liberating ministry, I am fully prepared to lead the UUA as we move into that future together.
(Rev. Hallman read her manuscript.)
July 9, 2008 at 12:21 am |
Great to have this up and running.
I feel like Rev. Hallman’s strengths aren’t in her general orating, but in the experiences she’s gained with the monumental success she’s had with her own church. That said, I can’t wait for you to get more posts up (Morales’ opening words next?) for discussion.
July 9, 2008 at 12:26 am |
Thanks, Aaron. Peter Morales’ talk IS up, or rather down: if you scroll down, it was the second post here, right after the introduction. I’ll have to figure out how to make this more transparent.
July 9, 2008 at 9:55 am |
A quick note after reading the two speaches:
Morales seems to have a direction and a positive powerful vision for our faith. Hallman’s speech did not seem to have that. All I get from Hallman is that she believes our faith has power, and that there are some women who agree that she knows. Where’s the plan? Where’s the vision? What will she actually do?
July 9, 2008 at 12:10 pm |
Hallman doesn’t offer a great vision, but seems to ask us to remember that UUism is already a great vision. She has a proven methodology that offers more specifics than Morales if I remember. That said, she really didn’t do well in her opening, but excels when asked about specific strategies.
Morales’ voice seems to do more to inspire though. My question is whether a president can affect change best by implementing new methodology, or by firing up the soldiers without too much direction.
Am I wrong? Does Morales offer as much as Hallman in terms of strategy?
This might turn out to be a sort of ‘vision’ vs. ‘experience’ debate that mirrors the Dems primary election.
I look forward to later posts.
July 10, 2008 at 2:24 pm |
Morales plans to set up tasks forces to address the issues, that’s a step more than vague statements of belief.
Also, I disagree with your characterization of Hallman’s speech. My reading of her text at least seems to reveal someone who has no concrete ideas so they go with “feelings”. I read about a couple of members and their journey, but no concrete programs. I don’t need to be reminded my faith is great, nor do those who follow this CHOSEN FAITH. I need someone who knows it and has a plan to spread the news. The good news. That vision Morales stated. Hallman? Not so much, yet.
At this point Hallman’s specific strategies should be part of her overall vision and part of her opening speech, not something she responds to when specifically asked. Even when I perused her page and her answers, however, I saw anectdotes but not answers.
I cannot speak for others, but I want a president who has an agressive desire to preach our good news and grow our faith and its message, because our good news empowers those activist and scientists working to pull our planet from the brink.
At this point, Morales seems to be the President who will be able to meet with and advise political presidents and other leaders.
Finally, in order to implement a faith, you must inspire. If your light does not burn hot and bright, the other chalices will not “catch fire”. Ours is the faith that burns the beacon for freedom, liberty, reason, and equality. Ours is the warmth that offers comfort to the Christain, Atheist, Pagan, Muslim, Jew and many others, shielding them against the dark cold of intolerance, hate, and destructive ignorance.
In this era, where that darkness seems to draw ever more closer and colder, I want a President of my faith who can make others catch fire too.
July 11, 2008 at 3:20 pm |
Quote: “I stand before you today because I believe that our task remains always new and always eternal: to build the church that shall be free.”
Thoughts:
1) Free to do what? Free from what? Free of what?
2) How does one achieve unity if everyone is “free?”
3) Are cause-committed people free?
4) How can a member who is an atheist be “free” in a UU church. Yes, you have no creed, so why not go all the logical way and become a non-profit organization. It seems a bit dishonest to accept membership from an atheist. This reminds me of the recent PEW study that reported that a percentage of atheist checked that they believed in God. Now that is being free. My opinion is that we are not free. We are what our genes, environment, culture, and brains allow us to be. We make pledges, commitments, decisions, live under laws, etc. that limit our freedoms. If UUA is “free” does than mean that they can’t commit themselves as an organization to what they are that reflects what they have learned and are now committed to. Could being “free” mean that one can’t really commit to anything!?
July 12, 2008 at 8:50 am |
Readers of this site should be aware that it fails the transparency test. It is sponsored by a vocal supporter of the Peter Morales campaign without that information being disclosed. Attempts by me to have the sponsor reveal his affiliation have been unsuccessful. Larry Ladd
***NOTE FROM MODERATOR***
The Presidential Forum site uses rigorous journalistic standards of objective reporting. Please click here for a disclosure of the site’s standards and practices.
http://uuapresidentialdebate2009.wordpress.com/about/
July 12, 2008 at 2:43 pm |
OFF-TOPIC
July 12, 2008 at 5:38 pm |
Hi Paul,
I think you make some good points. Part of the UUA’s difficulties in leading have been a a result of their inability to articulate a vision that means something- that leads to action. While I think there are uniting principles that connect atheists, agnostics, and deists together in UUism, the problem with freedom as a static goal is sort of as you describe.
UUism is about constant searching, about challenging creeds, and binding oneself to open-mindedness.
I think open-mindedness, the ability to change, and a determination to continually search would start to get at what Hallman means by ‘free’. Not a static state of being, but an active willingness to throw of restraints in an effort toward continual growth.